Potential for controlled traffic farming (CTF) in grass silage production: agronomics, system design and economics

Hargreaves, P.R.; Peets, S.; Chamen, W.C.T.; White, D.R.; Misiewicz, P.A. and Godwin, R.J. (2017) Potential for controlled traffic farming (CTF) in grass silage production: agronomics, system design and economics. Advances in Animal Biosciences, 8 (02). pp. 776-781.

[img] Text
Sven Peets potential for controlled traffic 16 Feb 17 upload.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 2 December 2017.

Download (162kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470017000747

Abstract

Grassland silage management is generally ad hoc resulting in soil compaction damage. Literature suggests grass yield reductions of 5 to 74% through compaction (UK mean 13%), while a 2015 study, reported here, comparing grass dry matter (DM) yield between controlled traffic farming (CTF) and normal management (N), found a 13.5% (0.80 t ha−1) increase for CTF. Commercially available grass forage equipment with widths of 3 to 12 m set up for CTF reduced trafficked areas from 80%–90% for N to 40%–13%. Economic analysis based on 13% increase in DM for 2 and 3 cut systems, gave an increased grass value between £38 ha−1 and £98 ha−1. CTF for multi-cut grass silage effectively increases yields by reducing compaction and sward damage.

Item Type: Article
Members: Harper Adams University
Depositing User: Ms Kath Osborn
Date Deposited: 11 Jul 2017 13:59
Last Modified: 11 Jul 2017 13:59
URI: http://collections.crest.ac.uk/id/eprint/15940

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item